Featured titleDokumenter

Gettysburg

DokumenterSejarahPerang

An examination of the Battle of Gettysberg on both the personal and strategic level.

Tahun

2011

Durasi

1h 25m

IMDb

6.5

Tonton Sekarang

Pemeran

AM

Adrian Moat

Director

Sam Rockwell

Self - Narrator

GW

George Wunderlich

Self - Executive Director, Museum of Civil War Medicine

Pemeran

AM

Adrian Moat

Director

Sam Rockwell

Self - Narrator

GW

George Wunderlich

Self - Executive Director, Museum of Civil War Medicine

PS

Peter S. Carmichael

Self - Director, Civil War Institute

GE

Garry E. Adelman

Self - Historian, Civil War Trust

SK

Steven Knott

Self - Instructor, U.S. Army War College

EL

Edward L. Ayers

Self - Author, The Crucible of the Civil War

HJ

Hari Jones

Self - Curator, African American Civil War Museum

JM

James M. McPherson

Self - Author, Battle Cry of Freedom

SR

Sean Rich

Self - 19th Century Weaponry Expert

CD

Cal de Beer

Doctor Wilson

DF

Dean Fourie

Dan Sickle (2011)

Greg Kriek

Jeremiah Gage

JA

Josh Artis

Colonel James Wallace

Greg Berg

James Wallace

Anton Blake Horowitz

General Carl Schurz

GG

Gary Green

Union soldier

Stephen Jennings

Maj. Gen. George G Meade

Charles Klausmeyer

Amos Humiston

RB

Richard Bedser

Writer

EF

Ed Fields

Writer

SB

Simon Brown

Writer

Trailer

Mungkin Anda Juga Suka

Gettysburg

The Day Hitler Died

Spitfire

9/11: I Was There

Secrets from the Sky

The Engineering That Built the World

The Men Who Built America: Frontiersmen

Grant

Theodore Roosevelt

The Booze, Bets and Sex That Built America

Queen Cleopatra

World War II: From the Frontlines

WWII in Color: Road to Victory

Greatest Events of WWII in Colour

History 101

Sistas

All the Queen's Men

The Oval

Kwa Baba

Combat Ships

The Men Who Built America

Blood and Fury: America's Civil War

Washington

Abraham Lincoln

Pilihan Unggulan

Ingin hiburan tambahan? Jelajahi hub game rekomendasi kami dan destinasi short drama pilihan.

Game Instan

Gamixo

Mainkan game browser kasual seperti puzzle, kartu, olahraga, dan tantangan cepat dalam hitungan detik.

Short Drama

VSKIT Drama

Tonton mini-series trending, kisah romansa, dan short drama terbaru dengan update harian cepat.

Komentar

10 Komentar

Angella ChawJun 9, 2023

Delphine cole🎊✊🏾✊🏾May 29, 2023

source: Gettysburg

RHONKEFELLANov 22, 2022

I'm not going to claim that I am an expert on the American Civil War, however I am a lover of history and as such I've studied it quite closely. Before watching this "documentary" I read up on the battle of Gettysburg and watched videos made by the tour guides who work there. It made me very interested to learn more and then found this "documentary". Figured it couldn't hurt to see it. Right? What met me was a disjointed, uninteresting, muddled portrayal of the events that took place at Gettysburg. You have Rebel soldiers dressed in rags, not uniforms. You've got people running all over the place pretty much never staying in any kind of formation. Not to mention all the things they get wrong both big and small in terms of history. The cinematography is sub-par to say the least, the camera is constantly shaking, it's cut up to all hell, using slow-motion as well as extreme close-up shots WAY too much. Even with them trying to focus on specific soldiers to portray whatever story they were trying to tell the whole thing is hidden by a 20 inch layer of vaseline. I have no idea what they were going for with this. It's boring, disjointed and impossible to follow from start to finish. Whoever says that this is a good or great film/documentary clearly have no point of reference because this is EASILY the worst historical portrayal of any kind I've EVER seen. Then again, what else should I have expected from a History Channel production?

Wabosha MaxineNov 22, 2022

As a student currently in U.S. history, I found this film to be informative in the battle of Gettysburg and what the strategic plans for it were. However the historical fallacies were inaccurate, such as terrain, uniforms,and they missed a large portion of the history in the first day. It was not necessary to focus on one or two generals, however the movie itself was informative and the graphic details well done. If the movie focused more on surrounding area and the question of escaped slaves - which was brought up and dropped - this would be slightly more riveting. It was not intended for the armies to meet, however it was not Lee's turning point in the war as this could've been pointed out in other battles. The movie itself was slightly unconnected as the plot moved forward, and the whole thing was drawn out, even for a three day battle. The highlights were the explanations of bullets and canister, which i identified as grapeshot, as these were helpful in showing how there were innumerable casualties with each hit. It was an interesting movie, but inaccurate in it details and portrayal of the event.

KabzaDeSmallNov 22, 2022

Though I liked the cast for the most part- I did think Robert E. Lee was best portrayed by someone other than Martin Sheen- this movie was mostly 4 hours of gentlemanly Southern dialogue lightly intermingled with actual battle scenes, during many of which I saw very few soldiers fall... on either side. This was the bloodiest battle on American soil, over 600,000 lives lost, yet I barely saw any blood in this movie. The fighting only picked up in the last third of the movie- actually, soldiers were falling and dying for the entire 3 days. To state it simply, it's no Saving Private Ryan caliber representation of war. It's way too squeaky-clean for my taste, I like a lot more authenticity in these types of movies. If this film were made today, we'd all have a better idea of what really took place. Also left out were some key participants like Daniel Sickles, General George Meade, who was hardly a blip in this movie, even Jenny Wade, the only civilian killed, was left out. Speaking of which, where was the part of the battle that raged in the town of Gettysburg in which Jenny was killed? Seems to me they could have covered more in a 4 hour movie, and left out some of the pretty speeches.

CamïlaRossïnaNov 22, 2022

The editor keeps using the same video clips over and over. I cannot believe that there was not enough material filmed to choose from. This is just lazy editing. Every couple of minutes I would recognise something as already seen and loose the narrative. I just hate that. Therefore this vote is for editing because it seriously spoilt my enjoyment. I did not like the use of colours, in my opinion b&w or sepia would work better. Washed out palette with dominant purple is so easy to do but it looks artificial and cheap. Also I did not like how interviews were used, all cut into three-words slices. It felt taken out context and faked, the true meaning cut away.

Art by DjessNov 22, 2022

I've been fascinated by the Civil War for 25 years. I've read just about everything I could get my hands on. Seen all the films, the big studio ones and the ones from smaller outfits. Well, this one beats 'em all! Fantastic. Makes you feel like you're seeing the real thing. Hey, don't listen to the others on the page who are complaining about details and such. This film is incredibly good. I've got a cousin from a few generations back that enlisted in 1861, fought in all the big eastern battles including Gettysburg, wounded twice and mustered out in D.C. after the surrender in '65. If he could be here to see this film, I think he would have been as riveted as I was by the realism. Even though I am in Canada now, this reminded how proudly American I am. Man oh man, great job!

user8978976398452Nov 22, 2022

This is entertaining. I will not deny that. However, the factual errors are outrageous. One of the former reviews accused those who don't like it as armchair historians. I have my Master's in History, and have done my theses on Gettysburg (particularly cavalry actions there). I must say that this is highly inaccurate. Watch it if you want to see blood, gore, and action. It is great at making the story intense. Just do not take it for the gospel.

Marie.J🙏🤞Nov 22, 2022

It seems very clear that others who have left glowing reviews of this "film" (I have to resist the gag reflex to call this such a thing) Like other reviewers who have stated quite accurately how horrible and inaccurate this presentation is, I add my thumbs down to the growing disdain. As a former re-enactor of the Blue and gray and a proud American, I was incredibly disappointed by this Farb- filled festival of feces. For those who don't know Farb is short for Farby which is a term we re-enactors use to describe inaccuracies in a re-enactors impression of a soldier or collectively in a camp or in a film. The most famous in "Glory"- a film I love when a young actor wears a "Swatch" his wrist as he waves to Morgan Freeman. Another example would be modern glasses or the scarf you can get at 7-11 with a paisley print. "Gettysburg" in this instance is an offense and "much offense too" as Hamlet said. The characters NEVER marched in the correct formation in the battle style of that day. And was all style but no substance. I am not only a former reenactor, but I am also a filmmaker myself and I was disgusted by the total lack of focus, and it was evident that the director and the brothers' Scott had no idea how Civil Wr Soldiers fought or spoke. The late Anthony Minghella , director of Cold Mountain, filmed in Romania and he had advisors like Michael Kraus, Don Toriani and the late Brian Pohanka to ensure historical accuracy. Pohanka and Kraus also worked on Ron Maxwell's Gettysburg and Ed Zwick's Glory. This "film"(again I gag), should be destroyed and forgotten and the same for all the DVD copies. This is not censorship- it is a mercy killing for the sake of honoring the men who gave the last full measure and ought not to be offended in such a way. This director is about to finish work on "Killing Lincoln" A friend of mine is in it, I hope that the director has done his homework.

Raffy TulfoNov 22, 2022

Ignore the reviews about inaccurate historical details, this film is very, very good. The action *must* be like it really was. Watch it. What a joke the reviewers here say about inaccurate historical details... they're just armchair historians giving poor reviews because they're obsessed with details about who did what and when. Who cares about who did what and when? It was such a chaotic battle, no one will ever really know the truth of what happened and when. The action in this film blew me away. My great great uncle fought there, and I'm sure he'd agree that this is the way it was. One of the best CW films I've ever seen, maybe THE best. It's the combat scenes that make it and that's what I, and most other guys, want to see realistically depicted. This film is simply the best. Ignore the nit-picking reviews. Darn the wannabe historians who think they have a corner on what the Civil War was about... Jeez.