Featured titleرعب

حجر 2: المحطة

رعبخيال علميإثارة

في أثناء سفر رحلة جوية من كانساس إلى لوس أنجلوس، يحضر المدرس (هنري) قفصا من حيوانات الهامستر للسفر معه على الطائرة، لأغراض علمية، يخبره قائد الطائرة، وبعض الركاب أن هذا الأمر ممنوع، يباغت أحد الهامستر الراكب (رالف)، ويقضم أصبعه، يصاب (رالف) بحالة هياج شديدة، ويهاجم المضيفة (باولا)، وينتشر الرعب في المكان، يطلب قائد الطائرة الهبوط الاضطراري، ويفاجأ الركاب بأن السلطات حولت المطار إلى مكان حجر صحي، ليس له مخرج، وأن عليهم البحث عن مخرج للهرب.

السنة

2011

المدة

1h 26m

IMDb

5.2

شاهد الآن

طاقم العمل

Mercedes Mason

Jenny

Josh Cooke

Henry

Mattie Liptak

George

طاقم العمل

Mercedes Mason

Jenny

Josh Cooke

Henry

Mattie Liptak

George

Ignacio Serricchio

Ed

Noree Victoria

Shilah

Bre Blair

Paula

Lamar Stewart

Preston

George Back

Ralph

Phillip DeVona

Nial

Julie Gribble

Susan

Erin Áine

Nicca

LC

Lynn Cole

Bev

Tom Thon

Doc

Sandra Ellis Lafferty

Louise

TK

Tyler Kunkle

Hvorst

John Curran

Captain Forrest

Andrew Benator

Co-Pilot Willsy

Jason Benjamin

CDC #1

الإعلان الترويجي

اختيارات مميزة

هل تريد المزيد من الترفيه؟ استكشف منصة الألعاب المقترحة ووجهة الدراما القصيرة التي نوصي بها.

ألعاب فورية

Gamixo

العب ألعاب المتصفح الخفيفة مثل الألغاز والورق والرياضة والتحديات السريعة خلال ثوانٍ.

دراما قصيرة

VSKIT Drama

شاهد المسلسلات القصيرة الرائجة وقصص الرومانسية والدراما الجديدة مع تحديثات يومية سريعة.

التعليقات

10 تعليق

Aivan PanganibanJul 29, 2026

Ang bida naman dito bata

nk.mampofuJul 22, 2026

Kim DomingoMar 20, 2026

Khuwaidli Khalifa OmarMay 30, 2023

Ronke RajiMay 29, 2023

source: Quarantine 2: Terminal

didilekitlaneNov 22, 2022

A really good sequel to a mediocre at best,prequel which was meant to be superior and it falls out its inferior to sequel that has much lower budget,and yet it delivers more bang per buck. The end was again open ended i bet there is going to be Q3 too. As for the acting part.All the actors did great job and delivered intense and wonderful movie. Offcourse there are some plot holes and misfits within the scenario like when the ''crazy dooms day scientist'' just grabs his pistol out of his bag,which passed through airport security checking like a tooth brush would.

Reabetswe.MNov 22, 2022

From start to finish the plot was closed and sealed. The fact that a character would be bitten within "minutes" of the film was obvious on where this film was going. The acting was similar to that of a high school play, dramatised and seemed like they filmed the dress rehearsals in the final edit. Many flat lined scenes, numerous mistakes including Locking down an airport after a virus is discovered. The pilot would of been informed of this mid air prior to landing. Allowing a suitcase containing an anti virus with syringe on a plane after the baggage handler has stated the new "lock down procedures" after 9/11... contradiction?? Moving a passenger from Wheelchair to aircraft seat? The passenger would remain seated in his/her wheelchair through the flight. (health and safety) The last scene in which the young boy leaves the woman in tunnel... She's still alive, not dead, he walks off, in the back ground is the airport with NO LOCKDOWN ALARMS/MILITARY/POLICE etc guarding this area...? All in all a very bland, "Sunday afternoon while half asleep after a roast dinner" film. I'll

omonioboliNov 22, 2022

Well, "Quarantine 2: The Terminal" was nothing like "Rec 2". It was a really good thing that they had not chosen to do yet another frame by frame remake of the original Spanish "Rec 2", as they did with "Rec" which turned into "Quarantine". The way Hollywood need to Americanize and turn foreign successful movies into American adoptions is just beyond my comprehension. Anyway, thankfully they had decided to go a total different way with "Quarantine 2: The Terminal" contra "Rec 2". There wasn't much new thinking to this movie, which made me wonder, was this movie really necessary? Basically you have the same ingredients from "Quarantine", just set at a different location - this time being an airplane and an airplane terminal. And with most of the movie filmed in the dark and in maintenance area, it seemed like they had taken that from the "Resident Evil" movie and just realigned it for usage in this movie. It was very unoriginal and very unnecessary. Now, moving on, the story itself was not bad, actually was an adequate continuation of the story told in "Quarantine". And the characters were good and believable, and were played well enough as well. I just had a problem with the lack of lighting in the movie. I hate horror movies that are shot almost completed in the dark. It is so 80's and so annoying. I was not familiar with any of the people in the movie, and I think it is nice to see a movie being made without major Hollywood names on the cast list to lure you in. And with the cast they had put together here, they actually made to get a good end result with the acting. Personally I am more of a fan of horror movies in their original versions and languages, be it Spanish, Japanese, Korean, etc. The way Hollywood need to cash in on the success of foreign movies ticks me off. Mostly the results of the movies turns out to be an insult to the original language version. "Quarantine 2: The Terminal", however, was as far from "Rec 2" as could be, and as such, it was not a bad experience. It was an overall average horror movie, though it lacked new ideas and concepts, it was all a bit too old and stale - used before. "Quarantine 2: The Terminal" will be a good addition to the "Quarantine" series if you liked the first one. If you, like me, prefer the original Spanish "Rec" movies, then "Quarantine 2: The Terminal" doesn't come up to the knees of those. But for an Americanized version, it wasn't too shabby.

KwestaNov 22, 2022

I had to review this movie after reading tj_director distorted review. Firstly,If you have not already watch REC. Never make assumptions or compare any movie with other movies you have never seen! Quarantine is a American clone from the original REC. Movies like Ringu (the ring) had a great base, western audiences may have connected with the story despite it being filmed within a different culture. I strongly feel a remake was plausible. Most Japanese-American remakes have become distinctive and popular in their own right. However, my first problem with the Quarantine series, the script was reused, the movie was shot with the same feel, The set design was identical, the characters all looked the same etc etc etc. I find it hard to contrast the movies in anyway. Except the language. Quarantine offered no new insight however it did present what was great in REC to a American audience. I rate both movies highly The difference between both REC and Quarantine is where the sequels begin to detour. REC 2 follows on from the events and gives insight into some unanswered questions whilst remaining humble to the original movie(s) aesthetics. Quarantine 2 shows the virus spread within a small airport terminal. Inside the terminal the movie shifts dynamic and centers on a terrorism storyline (which seems very common in movies of late) that contributed to ruining the movie and distorting how great the original movies were. If you are a fan of REC 1,2 and Quarantine avoid this movie like a plague. It bares no resemblance to these horror movies except by name. It is a badly made B-movie. It features sparse amounts of zombies popping in frame like a really bad zombie-pantomime. The set design was reused resembling a scene in Sesame St. This has to be worst horror- movie of 2011, utterly disgusted it is a sequel to Quarantine. Robert

abida.mussaaNov 22, 2022

I usually don't write reviews for B-movies, but this one made me write one just to let people know that as a B-movie, it's pretty good. Note that the 7 star rating is to compare it with other B-movies. The movie starts off quite well and right from the beginning, you start to like the characters, except for the hooded frowning kid that looked like Justin Bieber as one of the reviewers rightly pointed out. I'd say such a built up is necessary for movies like this, because if you don't care about who lives and who dies, the movie gets pointless much like the Final Destination 4. The flight attendants were likable and the movie had a real feel to it. It didn't look artificial and was much more believable than what you get in REC. There's plenty of gore and a few head-shots if that's what you're looking for. The fast moving zombies really make adrenaline rush through your vessels. The plot is believable and while I've seen the same scenario a hundred times, it didn't make the movie boring. It's got something to do with the way the movie is structured. Good dialogues, satisfactory performances, fast-paced action scenes, and an unpredictable ending. It wasn't cliché as far as I'm concerned. If you're into zombie movies and if you liked REC,I recommend this title to you. Final score: 7/10